Editor’s summary

The puzzling imbalance between matter and antimatter in the universe can be explained by the breaking of charge parity symmetry. The standard model of particle physics does predict a slight breaking of this symmetry but is insufficient to explain the observations. Many extensions to the standard model have been proposed to resolve this discrepancy. To test such model extensions, tabletop experiments that measure the electron’s electric dipole moment (eEDM), a measure of symmetry breaking, have looked very promising. Roussy et al. exploited the large electric fields inside the polar molecular ions of hafnium fluoride to measure the eEDM to extremely high precision (see the Perspective by Fan and Jayich). The uncertainty of the measurement compares favorably to those achievable through accelerator-based experiments. —JS

Abstract

The imbalance of matter and antimatter in our Universe provides compelling motivation to search for undiscovered particles that violate charge-parity symmetry. Interactions with vacuum fluctuations of the fields associated with these new particles will induce an electric dipole moment of the electron (eEDM). We present the most precise measurement yet of the eEDM using electrons confined inside molecular ions, subjected to a huge intramolecular electric field, and evolving coherently for up to 3 seconds. Our result is consistent with zero and improves on the previous best upper bound by a factor of ~2.4. Our results provide constraints on broad classes of new physics above 1013 electron volts, beyond the direct reach of the current particle colliders or those likely to be available in the coming decades.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Supplementary Materials

This PDF file includes:

Materials and Methods
Figs. S1 and S2
References (39–42)

References and Notes

1
I. B. Khriplovich, S. K. Lamoreaux, CP Violation Without Strangeness: Electric Dipole Moments of Particles, Atoms, and Molecules, Texts and Monographs in Physics (Springer, 1997).
2
C. Patrignani, Review of Particle Physics. Chin. Phys. C40, 100001 (2016).
3
Y. Yamaguchi, N. Yamanaka, Large Long-Distance Contributions to the Electric Dipole Moments of Charged Leptons in the Standard Model. Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 241802 (2020).
4
Y. Ema, T. Gao, M. Pospelov, Standard Model Prediction for Paramagnetic Electric Dipole Moments. Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 231801 (2022).
5
M. Dine, A. Kusenko, Origin of the matter-antimatter asymmetry. Rev. Mod. Phys.76, 1–30 (2003).
6
A. D. Sakharov, Violation of CP Invariance, C asymmetry, and baryon asymmetry of the Universe. Pis’ma Z. Eksp. Teor. Fiz.5, 32–35 (1967).
7
M. B. Gavela, P. Hernández, J. Orloff, O. Pène, Standard Model CP-Violation and Baryon Asymmetry. Mod. Phys. Lett. A09, 795–809 (1994).
8
M. Pospelov, A. Ritz, Electric dipole moments as probes of new physics. Ann. Phys.318, 119–169 (2005).
9
J. Engel, M. J. Ramsey-Musolf, U. Van Kolck, Electric dipole moments of nucleons, nuclei, and atoms: The Standard Model and beyond. Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.71, 21–74 (2013).
10
Y. Nakai, M. Reece, Electric dipole moments in natural supersymmetry. J. High Energy Phys.2017, 31 (2017).
11
J. J. Hudson, D. M. Kara, I. J. Smallman, B. E. Sauer, M. R. Tarbutt, E. A. Hinds, Improved measurement of the shape of the electron. Nature473, 493–496 (2011).
12
W. B. Cairncross, D. N. Gresh, M. Grau, K. C. Cossel, T. S. Roussy, Y. Ni, Y. Zhou, J. Ye, E. A. Cornell, Precision Measurement of the Electron’s Electric Dipole Moment Using Trapped Molecular Ions. Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 153001 (2017).
13
ACME Collaboration, Improved limit on the electric dipole moment of the electron. Nature562, 355–360 (2018).
14
I. Kozyryev, N. R. Hutzler, Precision Measurement of Time-Reversal Symmetry Violation with Laser-Cooled Polyatomic Molecules. Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 133002 (2017).
15
A. Vutha, M. Horbatsch, E. Hessels, Orientation-dependent hyperfine structure of polar molecules in a rare-gas matrix: A scheme for measuring the electron electric dipole moment. Phys. Rev. A98, 032513 (2018).
16
The NL-eEDM collaboration, P. Aggarwal, H. L. Bethlem, A. Borschevsky, M. Denis, K. Esajas, P. A. B. Haase, Y. Hao, S. Hoekstra, K. Jungmann, T. B. Meijknecht, M. C. Mooij, R. G. E. Timmermans, W. Ubachs, L. Willmann, L. A. Zapara, Measuring the electric dipole moment of the electron in BaF. Eur. Phys. J. D72, 197 (2018).
17
N. Fitch, J. Lim, E. Hinds, B. Sauer, M. Tarbutt, Methods for measuring the electron’s electric dipole moment using ultracold YbF molecules. Quantum Sci. Technol.6, 014006 (2020).
18
A. E. Leanhardt, J. L. Bohn, H. Loh, P. Maletinsky, E. R. Meyer, L. C. Sinclair, R. P. Stutz, E. A. Cornell, High-resolution spectroscopy on trapped molecular ions in rotating electric fields: A new approach for measuring the electron electric dipole moment. J. Mol. Spectrosc.270, 1–25 (2011).
19
E. R. Meyer, J. L. Bohn, M. P. Deskevich, Candidate molecular ions for an electron electric dipole moment experiment. Phys. Rev. A73, 062108 (2006).
20
A. Petrov, N. Mosyagin, T. Isaev, A. Titov, Theoretical study of Hf F + in search of the electron electric dipole moment. Phys. Rev. A76, 030501 (2007).
21
L. V. Skripnikov, Communication: Theoretical study of HfF+ cation to search for the T,P-odd interactions. J. Chem. Phys.147, 021101 (2017).
22
T. Fleig, P, T -odd and magnetic hyperfine-interaction constants and excited-state lifetime for HfF +. Phys. Rev. A96, 040502 (2017).
23
L. Caldwell, T. S. Roussy, T. Wright, W. B. Cairncross, Y. Shagam, K. B. Ng, N. Schlossberger, S. Y. Park, A. Wang, J. Ye, E. A. Cornell, Systematic and statistical uncertainty evaluation of the HfF+ electron electric dipole moment experiment. arXiv:2212.11837 [physics.atom-ph] (2022).
24
Materials and methods are available as supplementary materials.
25
K. K. Ni, H. Loh, M. Grau, K. C. Cossel, J. Ye, E. A. Cornell, State-specific detection of trapped HfF+ by photodissociation. J. Mol. Spectrosc.300, 12–15 (2014).
26
Y. Shagam, W. B. Cairncross, T. S. Roussy, Y. Zhou, K. B. Ng, D. N. Gresh, T. Grogan, J. Ye, E. A. Cornell, Continuous temporal ion detection combined with time-gated imaging: Normalization over a large dynamic range. J. Mol. Spectrosc.368, 111257 (2020).
27
Y. Zhou, Y. Shagam, W. B. Cairncross, K. B. Ng, T. S. Roussy, T. Grogan, K. Boyce, A. Vigil, M. Pettine, T. Zelevinsky, J. Ye, E. A. Cornell, Second-Scale Coherence Measured at the Quantum Projection Noise Limit with Hundreds of Molecular Ions. Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 053201 (2020).
28
H. Loh, “Search for an electron electric dipole moment with trapped molecular ions,” thesis, University of Colorado Boulder and JILA (2013).
29
ACME Collaboration, J. Baron, W. C. Campbell, D. DeMille, J. M. Doyle, G. Gabrielse, Y. V. Gurevich, P. W. Hess, N. R. Hutzler, E. Kirilov, I. Kozyryev, B. R. O’Leary, C. D. Panda, M. F. Parsons, E. S. Petrik, B. Spaun, A. C. Vutha, A. D. West, Order of magnitude smaller limit on the electric dipole moment of the electron. Science343, 269–-272 (2014).
30
We define the mean frequency to be always positive. If we had instead allowed the fringe frequency to change sign when the sign of the magnetic bias field changes, our science signal would have been fD.
31
T. Fleig, M. Jung, Model-independent determinations of the electron EDM and the role of diamagnetic atoms. J. High Energy Phys.2018, 12 (2018).
32
L. Canetti, M. Drewes, M. Shaposhnikov, Matter and antimatter in the universe. New J. Phys.14, 095012 (2012).
33
T. Chupp, P. Fierlinger, M. Ramsey-Musolf, J. Singh, Electric dipole moments of atoms, molecules, nuclei, and particles. Rev. Mod. Phys.91, 015001 (2019).
34
T. Bose et al., “Report of the Topical Group on Physics Beyond the Standard Model at Energy Frontier for Snowmass 2021” in Proceedings of the 2022 Snowmass Summer Study, Seattle, WA, 17 to 26 July 2022.
35
T. Chupp, M. Ramsey-Musolf, Electric dipole moments: A global analysis. Phys. Rev. C Nucl. Phys.91, 035502 (2015).
36
M. Denis, M. S. Nørby, H. J. A. Jensen, A. S. P. Gomes, M. K. Nayak, S. Knecht, T. Fleig, Theoretical study on ThF +, a prospective system in search of time-reversal violation. New J. Phys.17, 043005 (2015).
37
Improvements are given with respect to equivalent bounds calculated from combined fit to results of (13) and (12).
38
T. S. Roussy, L. Caldwell, T. Wright, W. B. Cairncross, Y. Shagam, K. B. Ng, N. Schlossberger, S. Y. Park, A. Wang, J. Ye, E. A. Cornell, Data presented in “An improved bound on the electron’s electric dipole moment,” Zenodo (2023); https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7837398.
39
H. Loh, J. Wang, M. Grau, T. S. Yahn, R. W. Field, C. H. Greene, E. A. Cornell, Laser-induced fluorescence studies of HfF+ produced by autoionization. J. Chem. Phys.135, 154308 (2011).
40
E. R. Meyer, A. E. Leanhardt, E. A. Cornell, J. L. Bohn, Berry-like phases in structured atoms and molecules. Phys. Rev. A80, 062110 (2009).
41
J. Baron, W. C. Campbell, D. DeMille, J. M. Doyle, G. Gabrielse, Y. V. Gurevich, P. W. Hess, N. R. Hutzler, E. Kirilov, I. Kozyryev, B. R. O’Leary, C. D. Panda, M. F. Parsons, B. Spaun, A. C. Vutha, A. D. West, E. P. West, ACME Collaboration, Methods, analysis, and the treatment of systematic errors for the electron electric dipole moment search in thorium monoxide. New J. Phys.19, 073029 (2017).
42
G. J. Feldman, R. D. Cousins, Unified approach to the classical statistical analysis of small signals. Phys. Rev. D Part. Fields57, 3873–3889 (1998).

(0)eLetters

eLetters is a forum for ongoing peer review. eLetters are not edited, proofread, or indexed, but they are screened. eLetters should provide substantive and scholarly commentary on the article. Embedded figures cannot be submitted, and we discourage the use of figures within eLetters in general. If a figure is essential, please include a link to the figure within the text of the eLetter. Please read our Terms of Service before submitting an eLetter.

Log In to Submit a Response

No eLetters have been published for this article yet.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Science
Volume 381 | Issue 6653
7 July 2023

Article versions

Submission history

Received: 22 December 2022
Accepted: 18 May 2023
Published in print: 7 July 2023

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Acknowledgments

We thank the staff at JILA for making this experiment possible.
Funding: This work was supported by the Cydney and Tom Marsico Family Foundation, the Sloan Foundation, the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation, NIST, and the NSF (award PHY-1125844). T.W. acknowledges funding support from NSF GRFP.
Author contributions: All authors contributed, in varying degrees, to the conception of experimental approach, molecular survey spectroscopy, apparatus design and construction, apparatus debugging and commissioning, apparatus maintenance, data collection and analysis, analysis of systematic errors, and preparation of publications. We are all responsible for the accuracy of the bottom-line result and of the written account we have submitted to Science.
Competing interests: The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Data and materials availability: Data and code used for analysis are available at Zenodo (38).
License information: Copyright © 2023 the authors, some rights reserved; exclusive licensee American Association for the Advancement of Science. No claim to original US government works. https://www.science.org/about/science-licenses-journal-article-reuse

Authors

Affiliations

JILA, NIST and University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309, USA.
Department of Physics, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309, USA.
Roles: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Software, Validation, Visualization, Writing - original draft, and Writing - review & editing.
JILA, NIST and University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309, USA.
Department of Physics, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309, USA.
Roles: Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Software, Validation, Visualization, Writing - original draft, and Writing - review & editing.
JILA, NIST and University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309, USA.
Department of Physics, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309, USA.
Roles: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Software, Validation, Visualization, Writing - original draft, and Writing - review & editing.
JILA, NIST and University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309, USA.
Department of Physics, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309, USA.
Roles: Investigation and Writing - review & editing.
Present address: Atom Computing, Berkeley, CA 94710, USA.
JILA, NIST and University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309, USA.
Department of Physics, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309, USA.
Roles: Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Software, Validation, and Writing - review & editing.
Present address: Schulich Faculty of Chemistry, Technion–Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa 3200003, Israel.
JILA, NIST and University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309, USA.
Department of Physics, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309, USA.
Roles: Investigation and Writing - review & editing.
JILA, NIST and University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309, USA.
Department of Physics, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309, USA.
Roles: Investigation and Writing - review & editing.
JILA, NIST and University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309, USA.
Department of Physics, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309, USA.
Roles: Investigation and Writing - review & editing.
JILA, NIST and University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309, USA.
Department of Physics, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309, USA.
Roles: Investigation and Writing - review & editing.
JILA, NIST and University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309, USA.
Department of Physics, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309, USA.
Roles: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Methodology, Project administration, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, and Writing - review & editing.
JILA, NIST and University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309, USA.
Department of Physics, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309, USA.
Roles: Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Supervision, Validation, and Writing - review & editing.

Funding Information

Marsico Foundation

Notes

†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
*
Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Article Usage

Altmetrics

Citations

Cite as

Export citation

Select the format you want to export the citation of this publication.

Cited by

  1. Probing fundamental particles with molecules, Science, 381, 6653, (28-29), (2023)./doi/10.1126/science.adi8499
    Abstract
  2. Quantum control of trapped polyatomic molecules for eEDM searches, Science, 382, 6671, (665-668), (2023)./doi/10.1126/science.adg8155
    Abstract
Loading...

View Options

Check Access

Log in to view the full text

AAAS ID LOGIN

AAAS login provides access to Science for AAAS Members, and access to other journals in the Science family to users who have purchased individual subscriptions.

Log in via OpenAthens.
Log in via Shibboleth.

More options

Purchase digital access to this article

Download and print this article for your personal scholarly, research, and educational use.

Purchase this issue in print

Buy a single issue of Science for just $15 USD.

View options

PDF format

Download this article as a PDF file

Download PDF

Full Text

FULL TEXT

Media

Figures

Multimedia

Tables

Share

Share

Share article link

Share on social media