<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xml:lang="en" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><title>Recent changes to feature-requests</title><link href="https://sourceforge.net/p/polepos/feature-requests/" rel="alternate"/><link href="https://sourceforge.net/p/polepos/feature-requests/feed.atom" rel="self"/><id>https://sourceforge.net/p/polepos/feature-requests/</id><updated>2009-10-19T06:50:52Z</updated><subtitle>Recent changes to feature-requests</subtitle><entry><title>Garbage collection between laps</title><link href="https://sourceforge.net/p/polepos/feature-requests/6/" rel="alternate"/><published>2009-10-19T06:50:52Z</published><updated>2009-10-19T06:50:52Z</updated><author><name>Javier Godoy</name><uri>https://sourceforge.net/u/rjgodoy/</uri></author><id>https://sourceforge.neta7930c10e2e5e33b9423a9db8bdadc2336fa1963</id><summary type="html">&lt;div class="markdown_content"&gt;&lt;p&gt;Garbage Collector should be invoked before each lap, in order to reduce the noise of objects from the previous lap being collected in another lap.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I placed an invokation to System.gc(); just before watch.start() on line 144 of Circuit class.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Though GC cannot be forced, this suggest the VM to do its best effort on collecting garbage. I think this invocation is a good idea because othewise I could (in theory) penalize some database because several objects were created for another database.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;One could also argue that GC should be requested between the watch calls.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary></entry><entry><title>Test H2 Database Engine</title><link href="https://sourceforge.net/p/polepos/feature-requests/5/" rel="alternate"/><published>2007-11-06T21:12:01Z</published><updated>2007-11-06T21:12:01Z</updated><author><name>Thomas Mueller</name><uri>https://sourceforge.net/u/thomasm/</uri></author><id>https://sourceforge.net171b8a1b1fc705e67eb4951c55b00d90f268bb22</id><summary type="html">&lt;div class="markdown_content"&gt;&lt;p&gt;Hello,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Is it possible to test the H2 Database Engine as well? The configuration is simple, as it is compatible to HSQLDB. You can download the H2 database here:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.h2database.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.h2database.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks,&lt;br /&gt;
Thomas&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary></entry><entry><title>Update to Hibernate 3</title><link href="https://sourceforge.net/p/polepos/feature-requests/4/" rel="alternate"/><published>2007-04-03T16:45:16Z</published><updated>2007-04-03T16:45:16Z</updated><author><name>Travis Reeder</name><uri>https://sourceforge.net/u/prophecyslides/</uri></author><id>https://sourceforge.neta28abbce7fd5abc240a55ea0ed1210ed4116f880</id><summary type="html">&lt;div class="markdown_content"&gt;&lt;p&gt;Currently has hibernate 2, should be upgraded to 3.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary></entry><entry><title>.NET port</title><link href="https://sourceforge.net/p/polepos/feature-requests/3/" rel="alternate"/><published>2006-09-21T00:56:47Z</published><updated>2006-09-21T00:56:47Z</updated><author><name>ncoded</name><uri>https://sourceforge.net/u/ncoded/</uri></author><id>https://sourceforge.net7cd5edd713fe2b376cbaf842b93ea81d19389c5f</id><summary type="html">&lt;div class="markdown_content"&gt;&lt;p&gt;Any hope of porting this project to .NET? &lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary></entry><entry><title>FOREIGN KEY</title><link href="https://sourceforge.net/p/polepos/feature-requests/2/" rel="alternate"/><published>2005-09-15T15:48:20Z</published><updated>2005-09-15T15:48:20Z</updated><author><name>Anonymous</name><uri>https://sourceforge.net/u/userid-None/</uri></author><id>https://sourceforge.net2dba300feaf2364bebfa6ed5551def331ca08e24</id><summary type="html">&lt;div class="markdown_content"&gt;&lt;p&gt;Performance tests with foreign key - relations would be &lt;br /&gt;
very interesting, because many real world database &lt;br /&gt;
application make intensively use of foreign keys.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary></entry><entry><title>Multi-threaded benchmarking environment..</title><link href="https://sourceforge.net/p/polepos/feature-requests/1/" rel="alternate"/><published>2005-06-29T18:43:03Z</published><updated>2005-06-29T18:43:03Z</updated><author><name>Anonymous</name><uri>https://sourceforge.net/u/userid-None/</uri></author><id>https://sourceforge.netf5a52f2139254561eff013538886e271c5125d9f</id><summary type="html">&lt;div class="markdown_content"&gt;&lt;p&gt;I think pole position is a great tool, it lacks in one&lt;br /&gt;
area however. It would be more usefule of the benchmark&lt;br /&gt;
was really multithreaded so that multiple threads were&lt;br /&gt;
executing concurrently against the database.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I think that would better mirror a real world&lt;br /&gt;
application as well as better separating the candidate&lt;br /&gt;
DBMS from eachother.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary></entry></feed>