Simba 3.5

Ready for real time.
Built for scale.

Fast to first audio.

72ms

Simba 3.5's time to first audio for 95% of streaming requests, under production load

Throughput per serving instance, against Simba 3.21.8×
Blind listening win rate against Simba 3.263%

The Simba 3.5 fact sheet's English results against Simba 3.2, as of October 2026. A 95th percentile under production load, not a median or a guarantee.

Read the fact sheet

More speech. Less overhead.

List price $15 launch price $10/ 1M

Per million characters of Simba 3.5 on Starter, launch price until 21 Nov

Starter subscription$10 / month
Simba 3.5 on ScaleList price $10 launch price $6 / 1M

Double usage on the fee, in one shared monthly balance, not a separate character allowance: it buys 2M characters of Simba 3.5 until 21 Nov 2026, 1.3M after, or 2M characters of Simba 3.0 and 3.2. Continued usage draws from your top-up balance.

Compare plans
Explore Simba 3.2's benchmarks
Choose the evidence to inspect

Independent blind preference

A frontier voice,
judged without the label.

1,244Elo across all provider voices, lowest price in the top ten of 96
95% confidence interval
±13
Checked
13 Oct 2026
Board
Lowest price in the top ten of 96

Artificial Analysis Speech Arena

Elo score and 95% confidence interval

Checked 13 Oct 2026
  • ElevenLabsEleven v4 Turbo
    Elo 1330, 95% confidence interval 1312 to 1348.
    1,330 ±18
  • ElevenLabsEleven v4
    Elo 1326, 95% confidence interval 1309 to 1343.
    1,326 ±17
  • AlibabaQwen-Audio-3.1-TTS-Plus
    Elo 1298, 95% confidence interval 1281 to 1315.
    1,298 ±17
  • CartesiaSonic 3.6
    Elo 1286, 95% confidence interval 1271 to 1301.
    1,286 ±15
  • GoogleGemini 3.8 Flash TTS
    Elo 1274, 95% confidence interval 1259 to 1289.
    1,274 ±15
  • AlibabaQwen-Audio-3.0-TTS-Plus
    Elo 1267, 95% confidence interval 1252 to 1282.
    1,267 ±15
  • InworldRealtime TTS-2
    Elo 1260, 95% confidence interval 1244 to 1276.
    1,260 ±16
  • GoogleGemini 3.8 Flash-Lite TTS
    Elo 1246, 95% confidence interval 1232 to 1260.
    1,246 ±14
  • SpeechifyAISimba 3.2
    Elo 1244, 95% confidence interval 1231 to 1257.
    1,244 ±13
  • BreezeBlueBreeze TTS 2
    Elo 1223, 95% confidence interval 1208 to 1238.
    1,223 ±15

The top ten of 96 provider voices. Bars show each model's 95% confidence interval; Simba 3.2's overlaps the models around it.

Inspect the dated figures
More independent evidence315,000 blind preference votes on Datapoint Audio BenchSimba 3.2 entry; exact revision and settings not disclosed · English customer-support prompts · Published 1 Sep 2026
How to read this benchmark

Artificial Analysis runs blinded pairwise listening tests. Simba 3.2 scored 1,244 Elo with a 95% confidence interval of ±13 on the dated board of 96 models, with the lowest Artificial Analysis price in its top ten. Its interval overlaps the models around it, so the result does not establish a guaranteed quality advantage.

The economics view compares the board's top ten by Elo. The dated figures are SpeechifyAI's reviewed transcription, not an official AA export.

Production US East

Fast from
the first byte.

56 msmedian time to first byte
p50
56 ms
p90
102 ms
Measured
15 Sep 2026

Streaming response

Time to first audio byte on our production path

0 to 150 ms scale

Measured first-byte latency, not audible latency, end-to-end agent response time, or a cross-vendor benchmark.

What this latency measures

These figures measure our Simba 3.2 production streaming path in US East from request to the first audio byte. Network distance, input length, client buffering, and the boundary a benchmark chooses can all change the result.

Time to first byte and time to first audible sound are different measurements. We publish this as a dated production observation, not a guarantee or an independent claim that every route is fastest.

The board's top ten

Frontier quality
without frontier cost.

40%lower than the next-lowest modeled price among the board's top ten
Simba 3.2
$6.60
Next lowest
$11.00
Unit
1M characters

The board's top ten, compared on one cost model

USD per 1M characters, zero-based scale

AA estimate · 13 Oct 2026
  1. SpeechifyAISimba 3.2
    $6.60Artificial Analysis estimates SpeechifyAI Simba 3.2 at $6.60 per million characters.
  2. GoogleGemini 3.8 Flash-Lite TTS
    $11.00Artificial Analysis estimates Google Gemini 3.8 Flash-Lite TTS at $11.00 per million characters.
  3. GoogleGemini 3.8 Flash TTS
    $16.50Artificial Analysis estimates Google Gemini 3.8 Flash TTS at $16.50 per million characters.
  4. AlibabaQwen-Audio-3.1-TTS-Plus
    $19.30Artificial Analysis estimates Alibaba Qwen-Audio-3.1-TTS-Plus at $19.30 per million characters.
  5. AlibabaQwen-Audio-3.0-TTS-Plus
    $19.30Artificial Analysis estimates Alibaba Qwen-Audio-3.0-TTS-Plus at $19.30 per million characters.
  6. InworldRealtime TTS-2
    $20.80Artificial Analysis estimates Inworld Realtime TTS-2 at $20.80 per million characters.
  7. BreezeBlueBreeze TTS 2
    $34.00Artificial Analysis estimates BreezeBlue Breeze TTS 2 at $34.00 per million characters.
  8. ElevenLabsEleven v4 Turbo
    $40.00Artificial Analysis estimates ElevenLabs Eleven v4 Turbo at $40.00 per million characters.
  9. CartesiaSonic 3.6
    $49.00Artificial Analysis estimates Cartesia Sonic 3.6 at $49.00 per million characters.
  10. ElevenLabsEleven v4
    $80.00Artificial Analysis estimates ElevenLabs Eleven v4 at $80.00 per million characters.

AA-normalized estimates for the top ten of the 13 Oct 2026 board. Subscription assumptions apply. Not a quote or total monthly bill.

Inspect the dated figures
Why modeled price is not your invoice

Artificial Analysis normalizes API pricing to an estimated per-character measure. For subscriptions, it uses the lowest-cost annual plan with at least 1M characters and assumes 80% usage. This chart compares only the board's top ten by Elo.

The $6.60 figure is that independent model, not a SpeechifyAI billed rate. Our current subscription fees, included usage, and subsequent usage rates are published separately.

Compare voices. Trust your ears.

Compare two prepared voices

Sample
It was the best of times, it was the worst of times, it was the age of wisdom, it was the age of foolishness, it was the epoch of belief, it was the epoch of incredulity.

Two prepared recordings. Choose the voice you prefer.

Voice A
Waiting for your prompt
Voice B