Security vulnerability fixes with AI agents

Thirty-eight findings and no engineers free, with eight weeks to the audit

Finding vulnerabilities was never the hard part. Fixing them on top of a full roadmap is. Agents patch each finding in its own sandbox, run your tests, re-scan, and hand your security lead a pull request with the evidence.

YOU HAND OVER38 findings · audit in 8 weeks
security-backlog · audit prepTriage…
38open high and critical findingsRe-scan runs after every patch passes its tests
CRITCVE-2026-1182lodash 4.17.20 · prototype pollutionOpen
HIGHCVE-2026-0931jsonwebtoken 8.5 · signature bypassOpen
HIGHSAST-112ReportRepo.cs · SQL injectionOpen
HIGHCVE-2025-4410axios 0.21 · SSRFOpen
HIGHGHSA-7fh5xml2js 0.4 · prototype pollutionOpen
MEDCVE-2025-3307minimist 1.2.5Open
1Triage
2Patch
3Test
4Re-scan
YOU GETEvidence pack for the auditor38 fix PRs · re-scan clean
Illustrative example
Built by Syncfusion, serving 47,000+ organizations.25+ years of developer tools, now reimagined for the agent-first era.
47,000+Syncfusion customers
1,600+Syncfusion UI components
25+Years of Syncfusion developer tools
Syncfusion component licensing is separate.
Monday, 9:00 · triage

Prioritize by exposure, not severity alone

A critical finding in a dev-only tool can wait behind a high one on your checkout. The planner maps each finding to where it runs, proposes an upgrade or a patch in the spec, and waits for your security lead to approve it.

INTERNET-FACINGINTERNALDEV ONLY
CRITICAL
1
1
1
HIGH
5
4
3
MEDIUM
6
9
8
Anatomy of one fix

Trace each finding through its fix, tests, and approval

An auditor can start from the finding and walk to the approval, or start from the approval and walk back. Nothing in between is a screenshot or a chat message.

01FindingCVE-2026-1042lodash prototype pollution, checkout-web.
02Patchcommit 7d1e04lodash 4.17.20 → 4.17.23 in its own sandbox.
03Tests612 passedFull suite for checkout-web, plus a test for the exploit path.
04Re-scanscan #8812 · cleanSame scanner, same rules, zero high or critical.
05Pull requestPR #1777Links the finding, commit, tests, and re-scan.
06ReviewL. Moreau · CISO officeApproved Tuesday 14:52, then merged by the team.
After the re-scan

Export the security fix records for audit review

Fifteen pull requests, each tied to its finding, its tests, its re-scan, and its approver. Export it as one document for the auditor, or link them straight to the record.

Illustrative example, not a quote
$4.40For all 38 findings
1 day 6 hImport to clean re-scan
EVIDENCE · 3.1CVE-2026-1042 · lodashServicecheckout-web · internet-facingFixUpgrade to 4.17.23 · commit 7d1e04Tests612 passed · exploit-path test addedRe-scan#8812 · 0 high, 0 criticalApprovedL. Moreau · Tue 14:52
3.13.23.33.4
The same day, twice

Raj reviews tested fixes from a scanner export

Illustrative example, not a customer result.

Here is what the work looks like today, and what changes when an AI team takes the busywork off the plate.

Without BoldCreateWith BoldCreate
Q1
Scanner reports 340 findings. Teams fix 20.Backlog grows
Day 1Scanner export loaded. Findings grouped and triaged.340 → 38 real
Q2
Audit in eight weeks. 12 high findings open.Audit risk
Day 2Fixes built with a test that fails before and passes after.Evidence attached
Q3
A dependency CVE sits unpatched for 71 days.Exposure
Day 3Security lead approves fixes in batches.38 merged
Q4
Exceptions signed to pass the audit.Risk accepted
Week 2High findings cleared before the audit.0 high open
A quarter of security backlog cleared in two weeks

Frequently asked questions

How do agents work through a security fix backlog?
Import findings from your scanner. Agents triage them, patch each one in its own sandbox, run your tests, and open a pull request with the vulnerability, the fix, and the test results.
How are security findings prioritized?
By exposure, not severity alone. The planner maps each finding to where it runs, proposes an upgrade or a patch in the spec, and waits for your security lead to approve it.
How do I know a security patch works?
Each fix includes an exploit test where feasible, one that fails before the fix and passes after. Every patch runs the full test suite and is re-scanned before review.
What do we hand the auditor?
Every pull request is tied to its finding, its tests, its re-scan, and its approver. Export it as one document, or link the auditor straight to the record.

Send us one scanner export

We’ll triage it with your security lead and show you the first fixes, with evidence, before you commit.

$199 a month for 20 seats · AI and sandboxes at provider cost + 10% platform fee